UPDATE 2: Kathy at FiveFeetofFury has more details on the fallout. Illuminating, but as she says, Surprise factor Zero.
UPDATE 3: Google cache no longer there but I have screenshots of the cache.
NOTE: This article was posted early this morning on Crisis Magazine. Less than 3 hours later it had disappeared into nowhere land, i.e. erased from the web. I couldn't find it on Google Cache either. Fortunately I have a copy of the text. Too many Catholic Bishops can't stand the truth. I guess they convulsed when they read the article and all hell broke loose.
This is a rare and honest look at the state of the Catholic Church leadership in the USA. Canada's state, in my opinion, is even worse, perhaps MUCH worse.
----------------------------------------------
BISHOPS TAKE CLERICALIST STANCE ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
by George Neumayr
The proper configurations of immigration law is clearly a matter on which Catholics can disagree. But one would never know that from the recent pronouncements of the U.S. bishops. What they call on their web page the “Catholic Church’s position on Immigration Reform” is not orthodox teaching but tired left-wing clericalism.
Blurring the line between real Church teaching and personal
political opinions disguised as Church teaching undermines both orthodoxy and
unity. But clericalist bishops don’t seem to care. They like that blurred line,
as it allows them to play lobbyists for their pet political causes, from global
warming to gun control to amnesty.
It is a scandal that the U.S. bishops feel entitled to use
the faithful’s money to put together propaganda campaigns for disputed policy
prescriptions. Were those policy prescriptions Republican rather than
Democratic, liberals would be the first to object and bemoan the insidious
influence of “religion in politics.” Imagine if the USCCB had a web page called
taxjusticeforamericans.org and offered a “parish kit” that explains the
“Catholic Church’s position on tax reform.” And what if it proposed an
“intercessory prayer”(as it did for “immigration reform”) for the passage of a
Flat Tax act? The cries of “clericalism” would be resounding.
But for what amounts to advancing the cause of amnesty, the
bishops feel no qualms about using the faithful’s money to supply parishes with
tools of propaganda, such as a “sample homily on migration related issues from
Cardinal McCarrick,” which “may provide some insights on creating a homily
related to immigration.”
Bishops who can’t even bring themselves to withhold
Communion from abortion advocates lash out at “opponents of immigration”
venomously, speaking of them as if they are apostates. By “opponents of
immigration,” the bishops mean Americans who support existing law. What is
contrary to Church teaching about that stance? Since when has opposition to
illegal immigration constituted a sin against “justice for immigrants”?
Hectoring the American people about clinging too tightly to
the rule of law seems an odd exercise of the Church’s moral authority. If
anyone is on shaky ground in the illegal immigration debate, it’s the Cardinal
Mahonys who encourage the breaking of just laws. What exactly is holy about
that?
The irony is that the same bishops who won’t criticize
Caesar when he is wrong will criticize him when he is right. Securing borders
falls within the authority of Caesar. For the bishops to treat the performance
of that legitimate duty as evidence of injustice does nothing to aid the
advance of the Church’s teaching on the natural law.
At the very least, the bishops could temper their
clericalism by acknowledging that supporters of existing law and secure borders
hold a defensible view. Instead, they act like Democratic partisans who use
sophistries and motive-mongering to shut down debate. It serves the political
needs of the moment to cast opposition to their lobbying as opposition to
“immigrants.” But that is completely dishonest. Does disagreeing with the
bishops on something as technical and complicated as “earned citizenship”
really make one less understanding of the true nature of justice? Is a Catholic
“anti-immigrant” if he favors, say, legal residency rather than legal
citizenship? There is no “Catholic teaching” on the precise form of a state’s
regulation of legal immigration, much less on its handling of illegal
immigration.
The specificity of their demands makes their clericalism
look even more ludicrous. The other day leading bishops were urging that the
already liberal immigration bill currently under consideration in the Senate be
made even more liberal. It has too many “restrictions,” said Los Angeles
Archbishop Jose Gomez.
Bishops have neither the authority nor the expertise to
descend into the details of policy like that. By doing so, they just weaken the
perception of their authority where it does exist. The Church in America
appears to be gravitating back to the “Seamless Garment,” the attempt by
clericalists in the 1980s to lump half-baked liberal opinions on trendy topics
in with the Church’s official teachings. Out of that confusion came a stream of
inane statements on subjects the bishops knew little to nothing about. This had
the effect of making all the Church’s pronouncements look like feeble opining.
A glimpse of the garbled message to which Seamless
Garment-style clericalism leads could be seen in Cardinal Sean O’Malley’s
recent remarks after the Boston bombings. “The individualism and alienation of
our age has spawned a culture of death. Over a million abortions a year is one
indication of how human life has been devalued. Violent entertainment, films
and video games have coarsened us and made us more insensitive to the pain and
suffering of others,” he said. “The inability of the Congress to enact laws
that control access to automatic weapons is emblematic of the pathology of our
violent culture.”
So a million-plus abortions a year is “one indication” of a
violent culture and another is the failure of a specific piece of gun-control
legislation backed by the USCCB to pass. Can’t the bishops see how this dilutes
the Church’s teachings? Can’t they see that in their desperate craving for
political relevance they make the Church’s most important contribution to
politics, the transmission of natural-law orthodoxy, irrelevant?
Clericalism ends up dogmatizing personal opinions and
relativizing dogmas, making the Church just one more forgettable voice in the
din of public life.
1 comment:
Or in short, the Bishops' undermine their own authority when the speak on matters of prudential judgement.
Post a Comment