For your nostalgic pleasure:
Posted to Island Catholic blog, October 18, 2005
Posted to Island Catholic blog, October 18, 2005
Just a week or two ago the Canadian media
was abuzz with speculation that Benedict XVI was getting ready to clamp down on
Catholic politicians who denied the teachings of the Church (a problem which
seems very prevalent in many parts of the world).
The word was that the Synod of Bishops and
Pope in Rome might decide to deny Communion to our very own Prime Minister Paul
Martin who supports abortion on demand and who helped almost single-handedly to
push through into Canadian law same sex “marriage” just a few months ago.
Here’s a story
similar to the news story that reached my own local paper here in St. John’s
Newfoundland.
While considering my civic duty as a
Christian and as a Catholic, I came to a couple of conclusions; firstly, that
many fellow Newfoundlanders might be very confused about all this hubbub.
Scandals have a way of causing confusion, and lots of other things.
Catholics have lots of experience with
scandal, approximately 2000 years of first hand experience. From a secular,
dictionary point of view, this
is a short description of scandal. As I said the Catholic Church has had lots
of time to think about it and define it.
Of course when it’s convenient (anytime
will do) enemies of the Church constantly remind the world (and the Church) of
these colourful occasions and use it to profane and distort the message of
Christ.
Which is exactly why Jesus and the apostles
so strongly warned against causing scandal. It destroys faith and confidence in
God and in the Gospel.
I surmised that people might be puzzled by
many things recently reported by the press. For example, why the prime minister
would be insisting on being a “strong” and “devout” Catholic; why his bishop
would be describing him as a “faithful” Catholic; why his sometimes parish
priest John Walsh declared the PM to be always welcome for communion regardless
of what the Pope said; why bishop Henry said he would deny the PM communion,
and possibly even ex-communicate him; why top Vatican officials and even the
Pope might consider denying the PM communion; why Charlie
Angus, another Canadian MP, has been denied communion by his parish priest
for supporting same sex “marriage” but the PM hasn’t; etc. etc.
By the by, Ted Byfield had interesting commentary
on this scandal in yesterday’s edition of Oh! Canada.
My second conclusion was that I should at
least try to clarify the situation on a local level and maybe mitigate the
damage to the many confused and offended souls. My simplest route to do this
was by way of a letter to the editor. I had the usual 300 word limit and that
really forces one to go quickly to the heart of the issue.
The following is what I forwarded to the
editor. It will appear in tomorrow’s paper.
Except for one small change. I was asked by
The Telegram to change the word “heretical” because it sounded too harsh and
judgmental. Father John Walsh couldn’t be a heretic, could he? After all, he’s
still serving as a priest.
Exactly another reason I had to write a
letter.
I write in respect of a news item in The
Telegram dated Oct. 2 entitled “PM won’t be denied communion.”
What
is the average Canadian to make of this confused state? Truly the issue is one
of communion, which refers to the state of being intimate with God and each
other and demanding a holy solidarity with Christ and with his Vicar, the Pope,
and the bishops.
This
solidarity we see most often expressed in the rite called the Holy Eucharist.
The news report conveyed the sense that bishops and Pope were just now dealing
with this question of denying communion to politicians “who go against their
faith.” Not so. Only a blind man could fail to see the age old and clear
teaching of the Church and Benedict XVI on the matter of refusing communion to
those who have broken with the Church by denying her teachings, whether the
issue be abortion, same sex “marriage,” divorce, etc.
The
power of the Pope in the Church is "supreme, full, and immediate” and all
the faithful, including and especially bishops, are bound to submit to this
power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience.
Failure
to do so is characteristic of “dissident” bishops, and the poisonous culture
that flourishes in their dioceses, where protest and confusion runs rampant as
well as heretical priests like John Walsh who flout Church teaching. They
demand equality and denigrate and dishonour the Pope in the name of
“independent thinking” and “conscience” rather than defer to his teaching and
that of Holy Mother Church.
Which
is why, without profound repentance and drastic conversion of Canada’s
offending bishops, they aren’t able to do anything about Paul Martin, who is
really a sad victim in this tragedy. After all, in a spiritual sense, they are
his fathers and gave birth to him.
In
the meanwhile the Pope waits, hopes and prays.
And by the way, I changed the word
“heretical” to “defiant.” It’s the pc thing to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment