On May 3 I forwarded a letter to the editor of our local St.
John’s, NL newspaper, The Telegram. I inquired as to whether I could
expect it to be published but I was informed that they have a backlog of
letters and could not say if, or when, it would be published. I contacted them
again just two days ago to inquire because as of yet it still wasn’t published,
although other, more recent letters from the public have been published.
As a courtesy, I held back from publishing my letter on this
blog until it had been published by The Telegram, but since hope is fading, I
offer it to my blog readers.
---------------------------------------------------
Philadelphia Abortion Clinic Horror of No
Interest to NL Media
42 days since the Gosnell murder trial started in
Philadelphia. Shocking revelations of gruesome killings, severed limbs,
drownings, bagged body parts and human remains forced into a sink
garburator. All perpetrated by a medical doctor and his staff. The jury
begins deliberations this very day.
What’s that? You never heard of Dr. Kermit Gosnell?
Well, no doubt it’s because your only news source is The Telegram, NTV News, or
CBC. Too bad because, as is often the case, these liberal, progressive minded
consensus media types decide for you what you need to hear about—and what you
need to be protected from. Apparently the assembly line butchering of born
alive babies—older than the state's 24-week legal limit—from botched abortions
is for some reason not newsworthy.
Kermit Gosnell, 72, is on trial for capital murder
charges involving the deaths of several babies which were unsuccessfully
aborted and instead were born alive and viable, but subsequently killed with
scissors at his busy Philadelphia “clinic”. Chilling testimony was given of
children screaming after delivery only to have their spinal cords snipped by
the doctors and staff in what was described by witnesses as all-too-common
“beheadings”.
The major news networks in the US and Canada have
been strangely silent—or near silent, with a few exceptions. Few have permitted
the utterance of Gosnell’s name. During some of the most shocking court
testimony over the past two weeks I tweeted on more than one occasion to local
media hoping to prompt some coverage of #Gosnell but my search on local news
sites still shows zero results. Clearly, news networks are drawn to criminal
cases with gut-wrenching, horrific details but why not to this news story?
If a story about innocent babies being treated
worse than sick dogs or pigs in a slaughterhouse can’t make it to page one,
what does it say about our media masters? Perhaps it doesn’t line up well with
the political agenda of the “pro-choice” liberal elite but is it too much to
ask for simple news coverage? Perhaps The Telegram and other local media are
counting on silence and the smoke of time to cloud the story and dull the
impact of the sensational trial. Will that make the heinous sub-culture of
abortion go away?
Or perhaps our media are simply helping us avoid
the dreadful reminder that the brutality of abortion is, in every case,
“intimate, personal and permanent.” More to the point, the Gosnell case bares
abortion to the bone, forcing us to ponder that a man could possibly face the
death penalty for doing the most evil things to fellow human beings that are
only minutes and inches removed from everyday legal sanction.
How’s “choice” working out for everyone in this
appalling story?
No comments:
Post a Comment