Friday, June 20, 2014

New Uprising Of Faith For Archdiocese Of St. John’s?

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca


From a blog entry dated September 1, 2005, St. John’s NL:

I find it very sad and awful that in our own archdiocese of St. John’s, Newfoundland, a tremendous amount of effort has been put into the preparation of a document entitled A Challenge To Change. This report was commissioned due to very serious problems being faced by the Archdiocese because of shrinking population and shortage of priests.

A whole host of comments, suggestions and speculation was offered as to the causes and cures for this crisis, the major solution advanced being the clustering of parishes. The report clearly acknowledges that Newfoundland, a province where a high percentage of the population is Catholic, has the lowest birthrate in Canada. The report concludes with a summary of the “responses” and “other comments” offered by parties involved in the process, the very last comment stating in an eerie, prophetic sense, the following: “At best this is a stop-gag measure. With one new priest every 3-5 years the end is in sight. We need to be preparing for a non-clerical church.”

What’s the most surprising, even shocking, and obvious omission in this report? Nowhere does it even mention that Catholic failure to follow Church teaching regarding the evil of contraception is an inevitable cause of low birthrates and dwindling populations.  And can there be any doubt that an apathetic and disobedient community of Catholics (as evidenced by this attitude) fails to inspire young men to the priesthood?

The Church is dying, and rather than allow the fresh breath of the Holy Spirit to speak new life by means of the Truth given to the Church, we prefer to discuss how we should dress the dead body and make final preparations for the funeral.

The video shown above appeared in a newscast last month on NTV News, on May 21 to be precise. On the same day, The Telegram released its story on the financial woes of the Archdiocese of St. John’s. Some relevant portions include:

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. John’s has appealed to its parishioners because of the state of its finances…
And as part of long-range planning, it will also examine its holdings to see which churches can be closed and buildings sold. For example, St. Paul’s and Mary Queen of Peace are close to one another, he said.

Among the 38 parishes, there are also a number of rural churches that no longer have large enough congregations to sustain the ex­pense.

“Sometime we have to ask some tough questions,” (Archbishop Martin) Currie said of the future.
Currie acknowledged the younger generation is not as active in church matters, including donations.

“Hopefully, we can have a new uprising of faith,” he said.

A new uprising of faith? “But faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God.” Can faith be separated from obedience to the Word of Christ? A certain Christian hymn declares, “By the pathway of duty flows the river of God’s grace.” And again, in Holy Scripture, “If ye love me keep my commandments.”

And Christ speaks today, revealing His commandments through His Church, through Her Magisterium. Through the medium of the Church’s teaching we know the will and mind of God to all those who call themselves followers of Christ. These foundational truths of the Word of God and the Catholic Church confirm for us that the Archbishop will not see any new uprising of faith in the context of this appeal because the basic problem being addressed here is adverse social consequences directly resulting from decades’ long disobedience to Church teaching on artificial contraception.

I’ve appealed to readers here, there and everywhere to examine the basic connection between our coming demographic crunch and the contraceptive mentality, particularly emphasizing the Catholic Bishops’ failure to communicate Catholic teaching on this subject.

There are profound effects upon a man and upon a society when he engages in an unnatural behaviour, that is, an action contrary to the natural law. Psychological effects, spiritual effects, social effects are chief on the list. Which, do you think, are the more significant effects, i.e. the ones with the longer term consequences? A true Catholic, in response, would doubtless point to the spiritual effects. According to Father John Hardon, S.J., the spiritual effects of contraception are fatal to the faith. According to Monsignor Vincent Foy, the denial of the Church’s teaching on contraception is “a crime…leading our beloved Church in Canada deep into the Valley of Death.”

Unnatural behaviours are objectively evil, that is to say they are fundamentally opposed to God and His nature and are repugnant to him. Now here’s where we connect again with the news report from the Archdiocese of St. John’s. Don’t you think that someone who represented the person and interests of God in a community would be careful to warn people of the dangers of offending God by such actions and the risks to their eternal salvation? After all, we are talking about sin and evil, plain and simple, regardless of the great numbers of people in favour of such behaviour or even practicing it. Clearly, widespread participation in sin hardly absolves the leader from his responsibility to warn the people.

Let’s ask ourselves how God views such behaviour carried out by His own people? Does he just see a happy clappy bunch of Catholics, a little bit ignorant but just trying to do their best, or does he want to vomit for the most part? The average Catholic is guilty in this matter, no doubt, but in all the condemnations Jesus issued he reserved the worst judgments for the religious leaders of his day who, in addition to themselves, were leading many others into the ditch.

There are social and national consequences to sin. Thousands, if not millions, of people are impacted and may suffer greatly, or even perish, as a result. Consider Sodom and Gomorrah, the Flood in Noah’s day, Nineveh, Israel in captivity, etc. Do some Bishops not grasp this concept? Or is it simply that they do not believe in sin, or don’t believe that their denial and apathy concerning Church law constitutes sin?

Indeed, the tormenting fact is that millions are already perishing due to the sin of contraception, a practice which became pervasive in the 1960’s and which paved the way for the legalization of abortion in Canada. There is a direct link between these two great evils and so far abortion has resulted in over 3.5 million deaths, to say nothing of the unimaginable numbers of little souls, who, over the same time period, have lost their bodies to spontaneous abortion in the womb due to use of the contraceptive pill. This is truly the most tragic social outcome of the Bishops’ silence. And, still, the killing continues day after day.

So let’s never forget proper perspective in this matter. Declining numbers of the faithful showing up for Mass and fewer dollars in the collection plate is hardly the real news story because hidden beneath the ink are more complex—and deadly—social consequences of the “sterile sex” phenomenon. Too many Bishops steadfastly refuse to discuss the link to the practice of this socially destructive behaviour let alone point to spiritually destructive aspects of the practice. Even when it is destroying a Bishop’s own flock and the surrounding society so many are content to say nothing and hope the ship won’t go down. Could we imagine a more severe case of compromise in spiritual leadership?

Perhaps they believe, like Cardinal O'Malley, that they can't speak out in the public square on any issues because they’ve lost their moral authority over the sexual abuse crisis.” If so, I say “Resign” immediately and make room for worthy Bishops who will not remain silent on the evils of the day.

When will Bishops acknowledge the word of Christ on this evil, do their duty by preaching and warning the people and so save their dioceses from sure collapse? And on that same day the killing of the innocents will abate.





Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Michael Voris, It’s Called Pseudo-Catholicism

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca

And Canada is likewise rife with this disease. Hating on Tradition: Another tough talk by Michael Voris.

It seems as if, in addition to bad prudential decisions, loss of supernatural faith and other considerations, that something sinister is also at work. And the object to the sinister actions—the heart of it—is always a dismantling of the church's tradition…and by this we mean a somewhat slow, seemingly calculated approach, to simply remake the church—to refashion her.


Monday, June 16, 2014

The Heart Of The Problem In The Catholic Church Is Tradition


Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca
"The Church in America is on her last legs and the Battle Royale is on; the fight for the soul of what's left. On the one side is the small but growing population of Catholics; in fact the only place where there is growth—the tradition minded. Unfortunately they have no power. That's because the protestant-minded, homosexual-friendly, man-centered crowd that took over the Chancery, parishes, seminaries, hospitals, and universities in the 1970’s  has never been dislodged, but they are falling victim to their own success…"




Sunday, June 15, 2014

UPDATED: Julian Barkin A Zealous Fighter For Toronto’s Cardinal Collins

UPDATE: In order to protect my sources I have removed from this posting the contents of an email sent by Julian Barkin to the Bishops of NL. The reader can easily click on this link to one of Barkin's blog postings to get a good idea of what he said to the Bishops about me.
----------------------------------

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca

It has come to my attention that Mr. Julian Barkin of the Archdiocese of Toronto has contacted the Bishops of this province, in an attempt to silence me from further criticism of his Cardinal Archbishop, Thomas Collins. The email communication which he sent out to the Bishops of Newfoundland and Labrador can be viewed below and in many ways is self-explanatory. Barkin lays some very serious charges against me, including slander, detraction, and calumny and claims that “the damage this man is unleashing online is gravely sinful”.

Interestingly, he does admit that “some of the arguments in the postings are coherent and well thought out” but nevertheless insists I must not say such things as I do about Cardinal Collins. My blog postings, he states, constitute a “façade of critical discussion using pro-life rhetoric, Scripture, etc.” which seems a very convenient tactic to diminish the weight of crucial elements of my argument. In addition, he labels me a radical traditionalist although I am altogether at a loss to understand how he arrives at such a label, unless he means a Catholic radically (as in “fully”) persuaded of the power and validity of Tradition in the Catholic Church.

Sadly, much of Barkin’s warrant is ill conceived, reactionary and illogical, not to mention replete with ad hominem attack. My criticisms of Cardinal Collins and other Catholic Bishops were quite objective and detailed and demand a thoughtful response, not a knee jerk reaction. I invite the readers of this blog to visit the postings he has referenced in his email below and discover for yourself whether Barkin’s barking makes any sense.

However, even though Barkin needs to do much more homework on the subject of my postings, his communique has been effective in getting the Archbishop of St. John’s, the Rgt. Reverend Martin Currie, to request a meeting with ME, the author of Contra|diction blog two members of the executive of the local Latin Mass community, Una Voce St. John’s, presumably to put some pressure on them to keep me on a shorter leash. Except I am not a member of that group and all of my writings, articles and social media messaging is 100% my own, without collaboration with anyone else. Nevertheless, for what it's worth and for the sake of full disclosure, I do attend the weekly Sunday Latin Mass.

As a final comment in this posting, I commend Barkin for his zeal in defending his shepherd, Cardinal Collins. All Catholics should be so quick and bold to do the same if only their Bishops were worthy and faithful shepherds. Barkin simply cannot—will not—consider the serious criticisms I have levelled against Cardinal Collins, regardless of the evidence I have provided. This is bound to cause him further distress down the road when his understanding deepens and he loses his rose coloured glasses. How much better though if his spiritual shepherd owned up to his full responsibilities and began to set his See in order!

For the reader’s information, and for the fuller picture, here is a complete listing of all relevant posts authored by me on this blog (and elsewhere) referencing Cardinal Thomas Collins.

Toronto Cardinal Collins Risks Charge of Hypocrisy 

Imagine A Conversation Between Cardinal Collins And Adolph Hitler

What Catholic Bishop Is Watching Over Justin Trudeau’s Soul?

Letter To Justin Trudeau From Cardinal Collins Fails Catholic Test

Canada’s Catholic Bishops Debated The Denial Of Holy Communion To Renegade Politicians 

FLASHBACK: Archbishop Collins Of Edmonton Would Withhold Communion

On Catholic Bishops Withholding Communion: Can Religion and Politics Coexist?

Is The Archdiocese of Toronto More Concerned About Saving Paper Than Saving Souls?

FLASHBACK: It’s Time For Pro-Lifers To Change Their Strategy In Canada

Archbishop Prendergast Must Go the Whole Nine Yards

Vote Life, Canada! Calls on Toronto Archbishop to Redress Scandal Surrounding Governor Schwarzenegger's Stem Cell Deal with Ontario Premier McGuinty

------------------------------------------------------------------

Julian Barkin's email to the Bishops of NL:

Removed


Catholic Bishops of Canada Helped Pave The Way For Global Communion In The Hand


Strange timing in a way: Last week Michael Voris unveiled  a shocking expose on the deceit foisted upon American Catholics by liberal Bishops in the 70’s who wanted to ram Holy Communion in the hand upon the faithful. At the same time Monsignor Vincent Foy was honoured at a special 75th Anniversary ordination celebration in Toronto where he was toasted in a homily by Cardinal Collins for his perseverance in calling Canada’s Bishops to orthodoxy, not only in regard to the rejection of Humanae Vitae by way of the Winnipeg Statement, but also in regard to the imposition in Canada of Holy Communion in the hand. Msgr. Foy was a fierce opponent of this practice, warning of its dangerous consequences and claiming that it was “introduced by deceit in the USA and Toronto.”

It appears that Canadian Bishops were one of the first, if not the very first, to start agitating for this permission from Rome. No doubt their success inspired and emboldened certain US Bishops to keep pushing for their permission.

Watch the Michael Voris expose here.

You may wish to get more background on the issue here before watching the video above.

P.S. The reader may say, "But we don't hear much conversation these days about this subject. Are any others talking about it? Surely there must be some prominent voice today sounding a warning." Yes, there is.

Saturday, June 14, 2014

Are Catholic Liberals Uppity And Sanctimonious?

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca

"Did you ever wonder why there are so many liberal causes pushed so hard by so many in the Catholic Church these days? Here’s why. Because liberal causes like fighting climate change give the guilty unfaithful a place to shelve their guilt. That interior voice nagging their consciences is in need of a place of refuge so they find other causes besides repentance to feel good about themselves because repentance would mean a change in their lives and the turning away from sin…a “conversio”. Ever wonder why they get so uppity and sanctimonious about their causes? Because they have to make themselves feel superior to the actual faithful in the hopes that their consciences will quiet down. That’s why they get so uppity and superior about their causes.  They pour themselves into earthly man centered issues because they have neglected the spiritual."





Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Toronto Cardinal Collins Risks Charge of Hypocrisy

Image from Socon.ca
Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca

On Sunday past, at the 75th Ordination Anniversary Celebration for Monsignor Vincent Foy, Cardinal Collins presided over Mass in the Extraordinary Form and delivered the homily. According to this blogger, Cardinal Collins

…spoke of the fortitude and perseverance we need to have as Catholics in our current culture and to fight the temptation to leave and reject her solemn teachings. He praised Msgr. Foy’s fidelity and persistence in preaching the truth of Humanae Vitae.  ++Collins noted that it was our duty to challenge and evangelize our culture, to get out and spread the good news of the Gospel of Jesus and the Gospel of Life.”

This is rich indeed considering the Cardinal rarely mentions the word “contraception”, or the phrase “Humanae Vitae” in his day to day oversight as Bishop of the Archdiocese of Toronto. If you doubt that statement please go to the Archdiocesan website and do a word search. You’ll find two or three search results from 2008 and 2009 pertaining to a community talk at St. Michael’s college on the medical consequences of contraception and a parish seminar on the “Contraception Deception”. Then go to the Archdiocesan blog and do the same.  With over 660,000 page views you’ll find basically one article on Humanae Vitae out of over 550 blog postings and that was not an article with a prominent Toronto Catholic’s name attached. It was a reprint from an article in the Irish Independent.

Cardinal Collins, like every other Canadian Bishop as far as I can see, has done nothing significant to promote the teaching of Humanae Vitae on an Archdiocesan-wide level. Have any of the Bishops instructed their priests to require Confession for this evil behaviour? The Cardinal has failed to teach and to warn his flock of the sinfulness of the practice of contraception and its contribution to the culture of death in Canada. He recently held a campaign to get people back to Confession yet took no steps whatever to ensure that Catholics had an opportunity to cleanse their souls of the pervasive and intrinsically evil practice of contraception. Is this the work of a worthy Bishop?

Apparently, in light of his comments in his homily at Msgr. Foy's ordination celebration, Cardinal Collins knows full well the scope of the problem in Canada about contraception yet refuses to address it in any concrete fashion in his own See. Rightly, he praised Msgr. Foy for his doggedness over orthodoxy for five decades or more yet he takes no steps himself to imitate that godly determination in his own powerful sphere of influence. What a sham! Unless of course we see a drastic and immediate turnabout in the Cardinal’s approach on this issue.

Isn't this hypocrisy? Isn't it very much like what Jesus described regarding the leaders of his day whose fathers killed the prophets but who pretended that they themselves would never have participated in such persecution?

Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; that build the sepulchres of the prophets, and adorn the monuments of the just, And say: If we had been in the days of our Fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore you are witnesses against yourselves, that you are the sons of them that killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. You serpents, generation of vipers, how will you flee from the judgment of hell? Matthew 23:29-33

And isn't there similar application for what Jesus said about those same leaders earlier in that same chapter who expect the faithful to live devout Catholic lives yet won't lift a finger to help them in crucial ways?

All things therefore whatsoever they shall say to you, observe and do: but according to their works do ye not; for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy and insupportable burdens, and lay them on men's shoulders; but with a finger of their own they will not move them. Matthew 23: 3-4

Why isn't Cardinal Collins doing his part to support Msgr. Foy in his valiant fight to reverse the culture of death in Toronto? Why isn’t he making Humanae Vitae an issue in his diocese? And very conveniently, the Cardinal did not mention Ground Zero for the collapse of morals in Canada, the infamous Winnipeg Statement. This brazen attack in 1968 on the Pope and the Magisterium by the Canadian Bishops has led to an actual false church of sorts in Canada, and a dangerous pseudo-catholicism which is sending countless souls into hell…

To say nothing of spawning a culture of death responsible for over 3.5 million children killed by abortion in Canada.

Cardinal Collins and his fellow Bishops need to come clean. These men need to stop their dissimulations, repent and do their job as Apostles of Christ, or RESIGN. After such outrageous behaviour in this life as Successors of the Apostles, do these men imagine they'll get into heaven with a wink and a nod from God? Either God has played a cruel joke on all of us or these men are gravely compromised in their callings.

Who knows, maybe what they’re counting on is a very long time in purgatory first? 


Tuesday, June 10, 2014

The Fourth Great Crisis In The History Of The Church


Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca

"The Internet has become the only organ of communication to the masses that liberals in the church cannot control. Ha Ha, and His Excellency is well aware of that. Hence his praise for the internet.  See, he gets it. The establishment church also known as the Church of Nice does not like clarity. Being clear earns you enemies and earning enemies means headaches and loss of income."

Sunday, June 08, 2014

Sixty Issues Bringing The Catholic Church To Its Knees

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca

Michael Voris and ChurchMilitant.tv have a good series of Vortex episodes centred on sixty issues that the Catholic establishment media won't touch when it comes to urgent coverage and analysis. These are the very issues that have contributed to the wholesale apostasy of the Church over the last few decades.

Watch the videos in order presented.

Here’s the PDF for the actual list of 60 issues.










Divorce Is The Suicide Of A Family


Read an outstanding piece by Phil Lawlor on divorce, the breakdown of marriage and the breakdown in a Church that permits it. It’s really not rocket science. One wonders when Priests and Bishops will take the teaching of Christ seriously.

------------------------------------------------

Needed: Speed-Bumps On The Road To Divorce
By Phil Lawler

The “empty-nest divorce” threatens to become a familiar rite of passage in American life. During the first few years after graduation from college we are regularly invited to the weddings of our classmates and friends. A few more years pass, and we hear about the birth of their children. Another decade or two, and we may receive invitations to those children’s weddings. Then, sadly, we hear that the couples, our old friends, are breaking up.

Every divorce is a tragedy. Lawyers and legislators may speak glibly of “no-fault” divorce, but in practice there is plenty of fault on both sides. Except in the most unusual circumstances—those rare cases when a civil divorce is the proper response to legal problems—a divorce is a public proclamation that two people have failed at the most important business in their lives. Divorce, as Peter Kreeft has observed, is the suicide of a family. But in this case the suicide may claim innocent victims: the children, if there are any; the unwilling partner, if only one spouse wants to end the life of the marriage.

Yet as sad as divorce always is, it is even more heartbreaking to watch the disintegration of a marriage that has endured for 20 or 30 years, and produced a handful of children. How is it possible that a couple could live together for decades, appearing to all the world like the happy heads of a healthy family, and then suddenly abandon the project they had been working on together?

It happens even among Catholic couples, even among active church-goers and model parishioners. Something goes terribly wrong, the couple cannot fix the problem, and a family is destroyed. Ordinarily, I fear, the pastor does not know about the problem until the lawyers have already drawn up the divorce documents.

As the world’s Catholic bishops gather for their Synod meeting in October on the family, the hottest topic in public discussions has been pastoral care for Catholics who are divorced and remarried. No doubt that is a valid concern, but another question should take precedence: What can the Church do to prevent the tragedy of divorce?

Yes, yes, I know that there are times when a civil divorce is the best solution to an intractable problem. I know that divorce, taken by itself, is not necessarily sinful. But surely we should not presume, in each case, that divorce is a wise choice, that the parties are blameless. Catholics, who see the marital bond as a reflection of Christ’s love for his Church, should do everything possible to preserve that bond.

When a marriage breaks down, someone (in all likelihood both spouses) has done something (probably some things, plural) seriously wrong. Pastors should remind married couples frequently that they have a solemn obligation, incurred by their vows, to preserve and strengthen their relationship. The failure to work on a marriage, to act with love toward one’s spouse, may be a gravely sinful matter. Regular homilies about marriage, including some practical advice, might help keep couples together.

Of course the best opportunity for dispensing advice comes before the wedding, and the Church can certainly show greater diligence in preparing couples for Christian marriage. Church tribunals now routinely find that young people married in the Catholic Church did not adequately understand the commitment they were undertaking. Those findings should be understood as a scathing indictment of our marriage-prep courses.

Or else, perhaps, those findings are an indictment of the tribunals themselves. Is it really likely that more than 90% of the American Catholics who apply for annulments were never validly married? Have diocesan officials become infected with the thoroughly un-Christian belief that ordinary people are not capable of lifelong commitments? Still more puzzling, to me, is the willingness of tribunals to annul marriages that have lasted for years and produced multiple children. If someone was too immature to form a lasting bond in his 20s, and never acquired the necessary maturity through his 30s and 40s, he should not need an annulment in his 50s, since he is unlikely ever to be mature enough for marriage!

Should the Church be demanding, in questioning couples who want a Catholic wedding? If they show no sign of understanding what Christian marriage entails, no interest in doing more than going through the motions, should they be advised against marriage? That sort of rigorous approach would be effective only if all pastors adopted it. Too often, when a couple is discouraged by one conscientious pastor, they find another priest, in another parish, who will officiate as long as all the forms are properly filled out.

And before we leave the subject of preparation for marriage, it is vitally important to stress that young couples should be presented with the full, uncensored teaching of the Church regarding the integrity of marital love. A love that is open to life is the best insurance against marital breakdown; among married couples who do not use artificial contraceptives, the rate of divorce is statistically insignificant. The Catholic Church has the antidote to a disease that is plaguing our society; it is not charitable—it is certainly not pastoral-- to keep that remedy secret.

Priests might be better equipped to help save marriages—to intervene before problems became irreversible—if they heard more about marital difficulties in the confessional. Regrettably, many Catholics rarely or never approach the sacrament of reconciliation. By encouraging more frequent confession, and probing carefully for signs of domestic friction, priests might find new ways to encourage couples to help each other.

The willingness to ask forgiveness and the readiness to start anew are keys to overcoming marital difficulties. They are also, not coincidentally, virtues that are nourished by sacramental confession. Moreover, someone who has recently been absolved of his own sins should be more disposed to forgive his spouse’s offenses.

”The family that prays together stays together,” runs the old adage. A household founded on faith has a better chance of absorbing shocks, an insurance policy that protects against the inevitable setbacks that mark family life. Pastors should encourage families to pray together in their homes: to pray for each other’s needs, to pray as a family, for the family.


In a society in which half of all marriages end in divorce, the enduring love of a married couple is a powerful form of evangelization. The Church should do everything possible to highlight the witness of faithful married couples—and to ensure that there are more of them.


Saturday, June 07, 2014

What (Unworthy) Catholic Bishops Fear Most

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca 

Catholicism in Decline

In the agonizing battle for the soul of the Catholic Church taking place daily in our midst—a phenomenon many ardent Catholics characterize as the “culture wars”—we see a steady stream of articles, news reports and commentary on how the Catholic Church is losing its hold on, and influence over, our society and even its own members, to the alarming detriment of Western civilization itself. The numbers and statistics certainly seem to back up such a view.

Yet I have a feeling a good number of high and well placed Catholics, especially media types, academics, and even many clergy, would take issue with the above assessment, claiming there is no real crisis to fuss about, only an ongoing challenge for the Church to remain relevant to our modern age, and a challenge for which we have every hope of overcoming, especially with our new Pope who is winning over interest and hearts in grand fashion.

But if there be no worrying crisis in the Church today methinks I must be struck with madness. One of my busiest blog tags is Catholic Church crisis

What then is the precise nature and origin of this waning power or collapse of the Church of Jesus Christ in our society and time? Again, there will be disagreement in answering this question. A quick glance at the news reports however would reveal a preponderance of stories and incidents arising from a failure to teach, implement and enforce Catholic doctrine. In many cases we discover a blatant denial or disrespect of Church teaching. Such failures are always urgent matters demanding address by the local Bishop but, even so, many times we see Bishops ignoring the problems or even contributing to them.

Some traditional minded Catholics point to the dumbing down of the liturgy since the late 1960’s following Vatican II as the fatal flaw precipitating the self-destruction of the Church. They contend that a disrespect and irreverence has crept into the practice of the faith due to a rupture with the sacred liturgy of the ages. Those who argue with such a premise can hardly argue, however, against the indicators of wholesale apostasy of the faith since the Novus Ordo has ruled the Catholic day. 

Knocking On The Bishops’ Door

So it all comes back to the doorstep of the Bishops? Yes, regardless of root causes of our current predicament, too many Catholic Bishops are failing in their duties as shepherds of God’s people. None of the kinds of symptoms outlined above take place in a vacuum but always reflect back to the oversight of the Bishop, a successor of the Apostles. If there’s one tag and theme on my blog postings busier than Catholic Church Crisis, it would be Catholic Bishops. Likewise my Twitterfeed often suffers from indigestion due to the hashtag #WakeUpBishops.

But how do we know they are they failing in their duties? Because, as I’ve pointed out above, practically every troubling indicator originates from or points to a breakdown or neglect of teaching, or its practice or its enforcement. The Bishop is the governor and chief teacher of his diocese, reporting to the Pope every five years but accountable only to Christ as His Successor in his See. Do not imagine that Bishops act in the name of the Pope; rather, they exercise their ministry "personally in the name of Christ." How much less are they required to kowtow to a Bishops’ Conference!

Is the Bishop then responsible for how the souls under his care actually behave as Catholics? In a clear and dramatic fashion, YES. The whole point is that the Bishop guides and helps the faithful understand their Christian faith and how to concretely translate it into action. Clear enough?

Bishops Must Obey God, Not Man

27 When they had brought them, they stood them before the Council. The high priest questioned them, 28 saying, “We gave you strict orders not to continue teaching in this name, and yet, you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and intend to bring this man’s blood upon us.” 29 But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men. Acts 5:29

The first Bishop, Peter, along with his fellow Bishops, declared: “We must obey God rather than men.” Can any sane person doubt that for the preaching of Christ and His Gospel to be effective, men must obey God more than they obey man; and more especially so, the hand-picked preachers of Christ?

Surely our Lord Jesus Christ is greatly wounded and offended when His Apostles prove they fear man more than they do God, and as a result His sheep are scattered. But is it correct to say that the Bishops of our day, His Apostles, do not fear God?

Of course they fear God, some of them greatly, but when push comes to shove, too many of them fear man more than God. When a course of action is predicted to upset or anger people, regardless even if it be a matter of Catholic doctrine—which is nothing less than the mind of Christ—too many Bishops fold and take alternate action, to the point of disrespecting or altogether denying Catholic truth. Thus, for too many Bishops, the only teachings “in fashion” are the pleasant and non-controversial ones.

Why would a Bishop betray Christ so? Many factors could be cited but since my focus in this article is not on that particular question, I will suggest a few of the more obvious factors: the discerning of a priestly vocation but with mixed motives; a weak and compromised spiritual formation, especially at the seminary level and weakened further by the laxity of our times; living out a vocation with little or no value placed on asceticism and self-denial; a rebellious and proud spirit; an inordinate number of rebellious clergy feeding on and fueling other rebels; rebels blackmailing one another; a compromised spirituality lacking in both moral courage and also power to confront evil, even when recognized. In short, the leaven of evil has corrupted the loaf and priestly standards have crumbled.

When Bishops Fear Men

It’s not rocket science; Bishops prove they fear men more than God when they fail to properly expound or defend the timeless truth of Catholic doctrine. Again, I repeat: “practically every troubling indicator originates from or points to a breakdown or neglect of teaching, or its practice or its enforcement.”

Accordingly, when Bishops:
  • fail to teach and inform the faithful on the most urgent and dangerous evils of the day, including guidance for the faithful on current events which might corrupt morals or otherwise publicly challenge Church teaching, 
  • intentionally omit the hard teachings of the Gospel, the very same teachings often criticized and openly attacked by unbelievers and worldly powers,
  • face controversy, unpopularity, criticism, alienation and even persecution if they stand with Christ and His Church on a particular subject, yet choose to remain silent or to dilute the message of Christ accordingly to minimize opposition,
  •  fail to undertake and safeguard in their See a program of education that will bolster the faithful in the whole counsel of God so they can stand against the errors of the day,
  • in the face of known dissent or heresy or public controversy or scandal by an individual or group, fail to make a precise, appropriate and adequate statement of correction based on Catholic doctrine, 
  • discipline or chasten their own priests for taking traditional stances on doctrine or practice of the Catholic faith,
 …they fear men more than God.

Shouldn’t Bishops Focus On Love And Compassion?

Some foolish Christians imagine that Church doctrine and laws spoil the “spontaneous” work of the Holy Spirit in our lives and we should instead focus on love and compassion. Unfortunately many Bishops seem to believe the same thing, judging by their day to day actions and disregard for Church law.

Again, this should not be rocket science. Consider what is termed “the supreme law of the Church.” A grade school student could tell you that a “supreme law” sounds like a mighty important law, the one law above every other law, one that you never break. Is it even remotely possible that Bishops don’t know about it or can escape scrutiny when they fail to uphold it?

Historically, canon law is the oldest continuously functioning legal system in the western world. Fortunately, throughout Church history some of the world's finest legal, theological, and pastoral minds have contributed to the formation of canon law, all trying to serve one goal, that expressed in the final norm of the Code, Canon 1752: "...having before one's eyes the salvation of souls, which is always the supreme law of the Church." [Source]

So the supreme law of the Church is the salvation of souls. Holy Moly, that sounds like good old fashioned missionary work! So, guess what the pre-eminent goal of the Bishop is? You got it, it’s saving souls. It’s missionary work. And missionary work is just what our Lord Jesus had in mind for His Apostles, the Bishops, when He pronounced The Great Commission:

18 And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Matthew 28:18-20

The Catechism of the Catholic Church makes the necessary connection when it emphasizes that salvation, and the missionary work that precedes it, must be grounded in truth.

851 Missionary motivation. It is from God's love for all men that the Church in every age receives both the obligation and the vigor of her missionary dynamism, "for the love of Christ urges us on."343 Indeed, God "desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth";344 that is, God wills the salvation of everyone through the knowledge of the truth. Salvation is found in the truth. Those who obey the prompting of the Spirit of truth are already on the way of salvation. But the Church, to whom this truth has been entrusted, must go out to meet their desire, so as to bring them the truth. Because she believes in God's universal plan of salvation, the Church must be missionary.

Viewing the teaching ministry of the Church through the lens of the salvation of souls renders each and every teaching failure as a detrimental event impacting the eternal destiny of possibly every soul under the care of a Bishop, whether Catholic or not.

When you think of your Bishop what image springs immediately to mind? Is it obvious to you and to the whole world that he’s the point man for Jesus Christ and for salvation for EVERY soul in his diocese? Is he seen as the city’s top missionary? Such would be the traditional, perennial view in Church history. Or is he known simply as another social justice preacher in town, a good guy Bishop, an organizer, an administrator, even a top gun administrator?

Jesus Christ proclaimed:

Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. John 8:28  

Since love for God and for Jesus Christ necessarily involves obedience to his commands (If ye love me, keep my commandments. John 14:15) we must of necessity know His teaching. His teaching is the doctrine and laws of His Bride, the Church. When the Apostle Paul instructed Timothy on his duties as Bishop take note of what he was also saying to EVERY Bishop to follow:

1 I charge thee, before God and Jesus Christ, who shall judge the living and the dead, by his coming, and his kingdom: 2 Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine. 3 For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: 4 And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables. 5 But be thou vigilant, labour in all things, do the work of an evangelist, fulfil thy ministry. Be sober. 2 Tim 4:1-5

So, to summarize once again: Preaching, teaching, evangelizing with the truth of Christ is the trademark of the Bishop. Is there constant and tireless teaching? reproving (taking to task, criticizing, correcting)? entreating (asking earnestly, beseeching)? and rebuking (sharply criticizing, reprimanding)? The salvation of souls demands all this and more.

The idea that a Bishop could carry out his calling without a constant and sometimes deathly fight against error and evil—everything opposed to the truth—was unheard of, even unimaginable, throughout the history of the Church. In fact, it would run counter to the very Word of God. For example, Jude's sole intention was to caution against depraved teaching and to exhort the faithful to maintain the teaching of the Apostles.

Beloved, while I was making every effort to write you about our common salvation, I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints. Jude 1:3

Teach The Faithful Or Watch Them Lose their Souls

We have seen that the salvation of souls demands that a Bishop, an Apostle of Christ, place a very high emphasis indeed on teaching. The clear alternative leaves souls in their ignorance and sin, heading for a Christ-less eternity. Bishops, like true shepherds, must protect their flocks from any and all sin—particularly the grave, mortal kinds—which would shut them out of heaven. The supreme law of the Church now hinges on this all important duty: identifying and warning against sin and teaching/preaching on the remedy for sin, i.e. obedience to Christ and His Gospel.

What now comes into focus is the eternal struggle between good and evil, between heaven and hell, between the devil and God—and souls hang in the balance. And this is precisely where the pressure comes upon Bishops. Those who are faithful to Christ and His Gospel will protect their flocks at all costs, presenting the truth of Christ and His Church in all its fullness, without compromise, regardless of the opposition from the world, the flesh and the devil. And we may be certain as well that such worthy Bishops make it crystal clear to their Priests that they expect of them the very same standard. They understand what is at stake. Because when it comes right down to the personal level, a Bishop who fails in this most primary duty can be quite certain that the Lake of Fire is his portion for eternity.

A worthy Bishop fears for the souls of his flock, watching constantly for “certain persons” who “have crept in unnoticed” and perverted Christ’s teaching. Ungodly persons and influences are constantly seeking to erode the faith of believers and remove them from the friendship of God. Nothing is more fatal to the faith than sins labelled as deathly, i.e. mortal sins. The Bishop is especially alert to warn his people to avoid at all costs any actions or behaviour that might lead to grave or mortal sin, because these cut the believer off in his/her relationship with God. A true Bishop would no more remain silent or restrained while the evil of mortal sin threatened to overtake one of his flock than would a mother look the other way when a stranger was about to snatch her only child.

Still less would a worthy Bishop fail to act should he realize that, because of his silence or restraint, any of his sheep risked the loss of their eternal salvation through confusion, misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the Catholic faith. Immediately every possible precaution would be taken to clarify the truth and preserve that soul from sin, whether by means of a personal conversation or by general communique issued throughout the diocese. If a soul were found to be persisting in actions or behaviour known to be dangerous to his/her spiritual condition, likewise a Bishop—or his Priest—would feel compelled to correct the sinner and instruct in the pathway back to God. Every soul is under the Bishop’s care. To lose one soul to the devil through his negligence, hesitation, timidity or fear would endanger his own eternal destiny. Such is the seriousness of sin and of salvation to a worthy Bishop.

This is no fabricated notion of spiritual oversight. Hardly: this is simply the Catholic faith at work at its highest levels and most basic calling, saving men and making them holy. Holiness and sin are mutually exclusive of one another.

And this is no “severe” standard. Not unless the Catechism asks more than Christ Himself asked. No, salvation in Christ has not changed, nor has salvation from sin.

Recall the promises made at a Bishop’s ordination ceremony:

After the homily, the Bishop-elect is asked to make a number of promises that he will commit his whole life to love and serve the Church. The promises recall the three "tasks" of the bishop:

•  to teach and preach;

•  to be a true shepherd and guide to those in his care; and

•  to help them grow in holiness (through celebration of the sacraments, through prayer and in other ways).

A Fuller Appreciation of Evil Is Urgent

Much of the conversation about the role of Bishops necessarily centres on error, sin and evil because, quite simply,
There is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.

Therefore every evil is to be exposed and avoided.

True shepherds will do everything possible, including at times the proper discipline, to prevent the flock going astray. In the real world of nature going astray meant almost certain death for a sheep and thus the need for both rod and staff. It was no accident our Lord used the symbol so often of sheep and shepherd to describe His relationship to us.

All sin is evil but mortal sin is considered especially so since it involves a known choice to commit a grave violation against the Creator. Furthermore, some actions qualify as particularly insidious forms of evil, regardless of the intention of the individual involved, and are termed intrinsic evils. In other words, these actions are so contrary to God’s will in their essence that whether or not the person is aware of the evil of his/her action, God has been gravely offended. A list of such evils would include, among many others and in no particular order, direct willed abortion, euthanasia, same sex marriage, contraception, rape, self-abuse, embryonic stem cell research (ESCR), human cloning, slavery, human trafficking, polygamy, lying, prostitution, homosexual acts, and use of pornography.

Could we imagine a worthy successor of the Apostles as anyone other than a man entirely consumed with keeping his flock free of sin and every kind of evil, more especially the subtle and insidious kind that might gravely offend—possibly without even their knowledge—the God and Saviour whose Blood purchased their salvation? Impossible. After all, the Chief Shepherd whom he loves and serves and after whom he models his ministry longs to accomplish exactly the same for every sheep in his flock.

 Now to him who is able to preserve you without sin, and to present you spotless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, in the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Jude 1:24

Yet now he hath reconciled in the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unspotted, and blameless before him… Colossians 1:22

For I am jealous of you with the jealousy of God. For I have espoused you to one husband that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. 2 Corinthians 11:2

Clearly, the reality of intrinsic evils cannot be avoided in any consideration of practical holiness. A little more should be said about this often subtle defilement and the following street-wise definition makes the point:

Intrinsic evil…an act that is always bad, always sinful, always always always. Never good, never appropriate, never useful, never, never, never. It is an act that is ALWAYS SINFUL in every time, every epoch, every era, every age, every place, every situation, every every every. There is NO GREY AREA! No doubt, no question that these acts (acts that are intrinsically evil) are always and everywhere and for everybody and for every situation, SINFUL and NEVER ACCEPTABLE. [Source]


The Bishop Is Accountable as Chief Help to Holiness

The follower of Christ is taught by the Chief Shepherd (by means of the Holy Spirit) and His Vicar, the Bishop, to shun all sin and evil not only because these offend God our Creator and Redeemer but also because the wounds of Christ our Saviour were a direct consequence of our sinful, evil ways. The lifelong pursuit of holiness, of separation onto the Lord, demands an ever-vigilant and continual spiritual battle by the believer to defeat the power of sin and evil while travelling “this vale of tears”. The Bishop will ultimately answer to God for his role in shepherding and assisting the believer to victory in this task. If he fails to “preach the word: (to) be instant in season, out of season: (to) reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine” the Catholic will likely be overcome by the world, the flesh and the devil and could very well lose his/her soul.

In regard to evils, it must be emphasized again that Catholic doctrine demands a dual approach by the Bishop. He must not only educate and train the believer to always choose the good and reject the sin, but he must also warn and teach of those insidious, intrinsic forms of evil which are so gravely opposed to God yet may be committed irrespective of the intentions of that believer, who is perhaps aided and overcome somewhat by cultural norms. Where success is lacking, God is sorely grieved and offended, the believer encounters a serious obstacle to holiness, worse evils—perhaps even sacrilege and blasphemy—appear on the horizon, and the Holy Name of God, as well as the Christian Church, is exposed to scandal and ridicule.

The solemn—and frightful—responsibilities of the office of Bishop can be glimpsed in a short portion of a conversation between the future Pope Pius X and his mother upon his appointment to this office:

But Don Guiseppe was weighed down by the thought of the heavy responsibilities of a bishop’s office. He tried to tell his mother of his feelings. “Mama,” he said one day, “do you realize what it means to be a Bishop—to have in my care the salvation of so many souls? Think of the responsibility! Pray for me Mama. For if I neglect my duty I shall lose my soul!”

But Evil Is Winning the Day in the Church of Christ

Referring back to my introduction:

What then is the precise nature and origin of this waning power or collapse of the Church of Jesus Christ in our society and time?

…as I’ve pointed out above, practically every troubling indicator originates from or points to a breakdown or neglect of teaching, or its practice or its enforcement.

No such breakdown has been more pervasive and catastrophic to Catholicism in the West than that resulting from a denial of the Catholic teaching on the evil of contraceptive acts. As many as 90% of today’s practicing Catholics at some point in time have “legitimized”, by direct actions or silence, the intrinsically evil and mortally sinful practice of artificial contraception. In short, Catholics live with and accept the practice of contraception in similar fashion to the practice of brushing their teeth. Perhaps no other serious evil has ever been so successfully portrayed as innocuous and normal among Catholics as has this evil.

One can hardly be blamed for thinking there has been, in fact, a concerted effort—nigh unto a conspiracy—to withhold the truth and deceive the people of God on the subject of contraception; that it is grave matter, that it is an intrinsic evil, and furthermore that it is intimately connected to abortion, another grave evil which it fuels.

And wonder we must, whether such a grave evil which has gone viral in a society for more than a generation can persist without a likewise grave consequence to that society? Can a sin be called mortal if it is not truly deadly in its outcome and consequences, regardless of the spurious claim that almost nobody knows that it’s evil nor that they are a part of the evil, nor that their actions comprise and/or feed that evil? Instead, look at the very real consequences: a demographic nightmare faced by our aging society and the emptying of pew and church.

Thus, every hour of every day of every year, evil is having the last word in our parishes; and through various strategies as well as outright silence, Bishops throughout the land—with shockingly few exceptions—are failing to expose this evil. It is being ignored in every practical sense, to the detriment and collapse of our civilization. Accordingly, we witness daily the wholesale commission of objectively evil acts by a vast majority of the baptized on a global scale: a staggering level and intensity of evil activity amongst God’s people that must quite literally provoke outrage in Heaven and offend Almighty God grievously.

The failure of too many of our shepherds in this regard is so profound, so flagrant, so reprehensible as to be monstrous, even diabolical. The shepherds commissioned to watch over our souls have been silent, those called to be accountable as our chief help to holiness have instead risked our very souls and help to sustain countless outrages against the holy Person of God Himself. The supreme law of the Church has been violated and the constant teaching of Holy Mother Church has been treated with utmost contempt.

Apart from contraception, one wonders: To what other secret evils are we succumbing under the leadership of such men?

What Unworthy Bishops Fear Most

What accounts then for such treacherous actions? Can such Bishops be true shepherds? Can they be worthy successors of the Apostles?

How is it possible? They have not continued in the Word of Christ, no longer are they true disciples; they know not the truth and now live as slaves of sin, out of fellowship with God; they do not the deeds of Christ for they are not the children of Christ; if God were their father, they would listen to the words of Christ; they are of their father the devil. No true shepherd of Christ could do anything but loudly and constantly proclaim from the housetops every instance of evil and danger to the souls of Christ’s sheep.


The greatest and most secret fear of an unworthy Bishop is that some day, maybe even this day, a light will be shone on his ministry such that he will be exposed as a fraud and a coward, something in his heart of hearts he knows may be true but something he has never been willing to settle with God because the price to pay was too great.

If indeed the unworthy Bishop yet knows the voice of the Holy Spirit, he himself knows there can be no other conclusion.

"When He, the Spirit of Truth is come, He shall guide you into all truth...`



Friday, June 06, 2014

Catholic Bishops Powerless To Stop Euthanasia In Quebec

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca 

How many of the 94 MNA’s who voted today for Bill 52 are Catholic? How many will present themselves for Holy Communion this Sunday?

If a defenceless little child growing in its mother’s womb may be viciously assaulted, torn to pieces and suctioned out of existence, all in the name of women’s healthcare, why would we be surprised when grandpa can be put out of his pain and misery by the same doctors in the same hospital who wish to provide him with “medical aid in dying”?

Respect for life in Canada has never recovered since the killing of preborns was approved under law in 1969. In actuality, respect for life took its biggest hit when the Catholic Bishops gave the go-ahead to Canadians in 1966 to use contraception since, they noted, laws restricting it might actually be contrary to the common good!

Hence, in their opinion [Canadian Catholic Bishops], legislation on contraceptives was an example where it did “not serve the common good to translate moral law into civil laws.” Thus they declared that they would not oppose changes in the legislation on contraceptives if “safeguards against irresponsible sales and advertising... were provided” and if personal freedom was protected. Indeed they went on to say, “we could easily envisage an active cooperation and even leadership on the part of lay Catholics to change a law which under present conditions they might well judge to be harmful to public order and to the common good.” October Brief 1966

Father Paul Marx, O.S.B., Nov.17th, 1979:

I told His Holiness that once contraception is widespread, the rest is predictable, and I spelled it out for him: In every country, contraception always leads to massive abortion. Once you have contraception and legalized or widespread abortion, birthrates fall; nations collapse; young people follow their parents in the abuse of sex; increasing numbers live together without benefit of marriage; adoption agencies dry up because some 90% of pregnant teenagers who do not abort keep their babies and thus start single-parent families; the prostitution of the medical and legal professions follows; venereal disease escalates; infertility increases; and, if you can kill before birth, why can't you kill after birth? So euthanasia is inevitable.


Wednesday, June 04, 2014

Way Too Controversial Catholic Subjects

"Jesus Christ was controversial.  John the Baptist was controversial.  All the martyrs were controversial. That’s why they were all killed. The real reason the Catholic alternative media is blasted by the establishment is because of what we talk about, namely the failures of the elites within the church to preserve Catholic identity and Catholic doctrine. Bishops who are guilty of this hate hearing it and their lackeys in their establishment media follow their lead and blast away. They never talk about these deadly issues…"