Showing posts with label traditionalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label traditionalism. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Michael Voris, It’s Called Pseudo-Catholicism

Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca

And Canada is likewise rife with this disease. Hating on Tradition: Another tough talk by Michael Voris.

It seems as if, in addition to bad prudential decisions, loss of supernatural faith and other considerations, that something sinister is also at work. And the object to the sinister actions—the heart of it—is always a dismantling of the church's tradition…and by this we mean a somewhat slow, seemingly calculated approach, to simply remake the church—to refashion her.


Monday, June 16, 2014

The Heart Of The Problem In The Catholic Church Is Tradition


Published today to SignOfContradiction.Blogspot.ca
"The Church in America is on her last legs and the Battle Royale is on; the fight for the soul of what's left. On the one side is the small but growing population of Catholics; in fact the only place where there is growth—the tradition minded. Unfortunately they have no power. That's because the protestant-minded, homosexual-friendly, man-centered crowd that took over the Chancery, parishes, seminaries, hospitals, and universities in the 1970’s  has never been dislodged, but they are falling victim to their own success…"




Wednesday, January 29, 2014

The Reign Of Christ The King—In Both Public And Private Life


What follows is an excerpt from a talk given in November of 1991 in the Chicago area by Michael Davies, well known traditionalist apologist. The entire talk is available in booklet form from TAN Books & Publishers. It is an inspirational talk that every serious Catholic ought to study.

Sad to say, Michael Davies knew more than most Catholics how too many Bishops can—and often do—impede the faithful in their rightful worship of God and in their rightful practice of the holy Faith of Christ. This may sound like a rather strong criticism of Catholic Bishops, those ordained to be our shepherds, but I assure you that it can be well substantiated and continues to this day.

In his outstanding talk, The Reign of Christ the King, Mr. Davies made some observations about the leadership that laity must play in preserving the Faith, speaking from his long experience of fighting for traditional faith and practice in the Catholic Church. One paragraph in particular I have bolded for emphasis. It sounds almost too incredible to believe that, in seeking to exalt Christ to His rightful place in the Church and in this world, too often “the laity must take the lead and shame the hierarchy into following us.”

This statement is somewhat reminiscent of one by Venerable Archbishop Fulton Sheen: "Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops like bishops and your religious act like religious.”

------------------------------------------------------


TO RESTORE THE REIGN OF CHRIST

We must make the social reign of Christ the King possible today. If we do not do all that is in our power to restore the Social Kingship of Our Lord, we are not worthy of our Baptism, we are not worthy of our Confirmation, we are not worthy of the glorious name of Catholic.  There  is only one  solution  to the problems  of mankind,  and  that  is  to establish  the  peace of Christ  in the  Kingdom  of Christ—Pax Christi in regno Christi.  There is no other solution to what Professor von Hildebrand rightly termed the dehumanization of mankind.

Hilaire Belloc explained that the two alternatives for our civilization are Catholicism and chaos.  Anything less than Catholicism—even if it calls itself "Christianity"—will not stand up in the long run against the encroaching barbarism. So it is we Catholics who actually hold the key both to the social reign of Christ and to the saving of our civilization. We must therefore all  work  toward the day  when  the governments of our  nations  (as well as all individual men) publicly recognize Christ, His Catholic Church and His holy law—and regulate themselves accordingly.

How is this to be achieved?  If we wait for a lead from the hierarchy, it will not be given. The laity must take the lead and shame the hierarchy into following us.

Do not say that this cannot be done.  It has been done  with  the  fight  for  the  Tridentine Mass,  which is  now being  celebrated throughout the  world  to  an extent  that  few of  us  would  have deemed   possible  a few years ago. It has been done with the pro-life movement, above all with the Rescue Movement. We now have bishops participating in Rescues, God bless them for it.  But they are following the lead of the laity.

During the  Protestant Reformation, almost  all  the clergy in England accepted the new religion without protest  until, in the West of England, they were forced to  return  to  the  traditional Faith  and  the  traditional Mass by relatively  uneducated peasants.  The fact that one reluctant priest was cut to pieces with agricultural implements seems to have given his confreres considerable encouragement in returning to the Catholic Faith! Hamish Fraser insisted frequently and forcefully that society, the social kingdom of Our Lord, is our milieu as laymen, and that we must make our presence felt. Hamish Fraser was a convert from Communism, and the great legacy which he brought from his Communist background was his commitment to action.

We can fight for the Social Kingship of Our Lord without the need of approval or leadership from our bishops.  We can and must mobilize all citizens of good will, whether they are Catholic or not. There were Protestants and even Jews who fought the "Gay Rights Bill” in Connecticut, and they were undermined by our bishops.

If anyone reading this honestly believes that society cannot be changed, I can only reply: "Tell that to the homosexuals, tell that to the abortionists." They have changed society, they have corrupted it, de­ humanized it, but they knew what they wanted and they were prepared to fight for it, and they are still prepared to fight for it. Shall the children of light show less zeal than the children of darkness?

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Why Margaret Thatcher Is So Hated by So Many UPDATED!




Denis and Margaret Thatcher on their wedding day in 1951
SEE UPDATE BELOW

“There’s something frightening about a tough woman with courage and conviction, when all about her the Nancy men are trembling in their Gucci loafers.”  So says Wesley Pruden, editor emeritus of The Washington Times.

But why are liberals and socialists so determined to hate Margaret Thatcher to the very end? Does her death and funeral remind them of yesteryear? Was it that she dominated them so terribly?

My analysis is much simpler. She was, more or less, a traditionalist Christian. She believed truth to be an objective reality. And she believed truth leads to freedom. To the extent that she embodied this worldview—albeit imperfectly—she brought Christ to the world stage through politics. And that explains the hatred.

Margaret Thatcher is getting her revenge on the Nancy men who mocked her in life, and who continue to throw rocks at her in death. Her reputation as “the Iron Lady” who towered over a plastic age is secure, and she’s getting a funeral that her girlhood idol Winston Churchill got before her. Big Ben, the famous clock that towers over Parliament, chiming the quarter-hour since 1859, will fall silent during the obsequies just as it did for Sir Winston nearly five decades ago.




UPDATE

I qualify my posting above with the following illuminating article:


I realize Thatcher supported legalization of abortion. However, she was not a Catholic and that is a significant distinction. The Protestant denominations have compromised themselves severely in many areas of theology and Christian practice. These sorts of compromises take an inevitable toll on the spiritual formation of religious followers and so the culpability of all politicians is not equal.

The interview described in the link above seems to indicate Margaret Thatcher's views on abortion were limited and qualified in nature.

Also see my later posting.

RIP