Response
from John Martignoni, Bible
Christian Society
Very interesting question there about Billy Graham being
saved or not. But, even though it is an interesting question, it is the
wrong question to be asking. I understand that we, as Catholics, can look
around us and see many Baptists, Evangelicals, Presbyterians, Lutherans, and so
on who, from all appearances, seem to be sincere and devout followers of Christ
in accord with the teachings of Christ as they understand them. They go
to church every Sunday, and many every Wednesday, too. They read their
Bibles, they seem to love their families, they volunteer at various charities
that help the poor and the oppressed...they just seem like all-around good
folks. But, what we need to remember, just as it is not within our
authority to condemn anyone to Hell, so it is not within our authority to
canonize anyone as a saint of Heaven, either.
No matter how good someone may seem on the outside to us, we
have absolutely no way of judging the interior of their heart - that is the
province of God, and God alone. When speaking about judgment,
particularly about his judgment, St. Paul said, “I am not aware of anything against
myself, but I am not thereby acquitted. It is the Lord who judges
me. Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord
comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will
disclose the purposes of the heart,” (1 Cor 4:4-5).
St. Paul did not even judge himself, because he recognized
that it is the Lord’s place to judge man - good or bad - not man’s place.
I want to expand on this by looking at that question about Billy Graham.
Will Billy Graham be saved, even though he is not Catholic? I think many
people, including many Catholics, would say, “Oh, absolutely. What a good
and holy man Billy Graham is. He obviously loves Jesus. Look at all the
revivals he’s done in his life. Look at all the people he has brought to
Christ. Surely Billy Graham is on his way to Heaven!” And I believe
anyone who thinks that way is doing a great disservice to Billy Graham.
Why do I say that? First of all, as already mentioned,
it is not our place to judge. Second of all, do we have all the facts
with which to make such a judgment? Have many people come closer to
Christ because of Billy Graham? Undoubtedly so. But, have many
Catholics left the Catholic Church because of Billy Graham? We cannot be
sure, but for the sake of argument, lets say that there are Catholics who have
left the Catholic Church because of Billy Graham - I would be willing to bet
that many have, whether he knowingly pulled them out or not. Which
would mean, while he has brought some closer to Christ, he may have actually
helped to pull some away from Christ. For any Catholic who leaves the
Eucharist has moved away from Christ.
Also, Billy Graham is a very intelligent man and a very
learned man, so it is reasonable to assume that he is aware of what the
Catholic Church teaches - about the priesthood, about the Sacraments, about
Mary, about the Pope, and so on. Yet, since he isn't Catholic, he quite
obviously rejects those teachings and he quite obviously rejects the authority
of the Pope and the Church. Jesus tells His disciples, “He who rejects
you, rejects Me,” (Luke 10:16). Is Billy Graham rejecting Christ by
rejecting the Church founded by Christ and by rejecting those who have been
appointed to lead the Church of Jesus Christ? We are not in a position to
know the answer to that question, but these are all questions we need to ponder
before we canonize the man.
So, why do I say it is a disservice to the man to believe he
is well on his way to Heaven? Because by doing so, we are essentially saying
that Billy Graham is just fine, thank you, without the Eucharist, without the
Sacrament of Reconciliation, without the Communion of Saints, without the
priesthood, without recognizing Mary as his mother, and so many more treasures
of the Catholic Church. So, since we assume he’s just fine as is, we
assume there is no need to try and evangelize him. And that is doing him
a disservice. That’s why I said at the earlier that asking whether or not
Billy Graham (or anyone else) is saved, even though not Catholic, is the wrong
question to ask. The question we should be asking is: “Would Billy Graham
have a better chance of being saved by receiving the Eucharist? Yes or
no?”
That is the proper question to ask about Billy Graham, or
about anyone else who is not currently Catholic. The answer to that
question, is “Yes!” Everyone who is not currently receiving the Eucharist
would be better off by receiving it. So, our question regarding the
non-Catholic should not be: “Are they saved” - that’s a question that is beyond
our pay grade - our question, rather, should be: “Would they have a better
chance of being saved by receiving the Eucharist?” Since the answer to that
question is, “Yes,” then the next question we need to ask is: Are we are doing
everything we can to bring those who currently do not receive the Eucharist
into the Catholic Church so that they, too, may become “partakers of the divine
nature,” (2 Peter 1:4)?
1 comment:
Those thoughts about Billy Graham were in the back of my mind, but you brought them to crystal clarity.
Post a Comment